British Diplomatic Oil Crisis: Contemporary Anglo-Saxon Geopolitical Rivalries in the Persian Gulf: Drawing a Lesson? Or Sir Anthony Eden‘s Delusion of Grandeur.

British Diplomatic Oil Crisis: Contemporary Anglo-Saxon Geopolitical Rivalries in the Persian Gulf: Drawing a Lesson? Or Sir Anthony Eden‘s Delusion of Grandeur.

Americans
to support it to the extent we could induce them to do
so.23

Though
containment of the Soviet Union and protecting the oil
reserves of the Persian Gulf from her reach was a basic American
interest, however, in Sir Anthony Eden’s view the United States
co-operation, during the Anglo- Iranian Oil Company’s crisis, meant
for the United Kingdom to give the Americans a share in Iranian oil,
or the new oil consortium of 1954. According to Eden:

The
British side had in effect to buy American agreement to come to
the rescue of British Petroleum (then the Anglo- Iranian Oil
Company) in its struggle with the Musaddiq government.24

According to Sir Anthony Eden, it was not
until he:

proposed American
participation in a new oil consortium that the
State Department agreed to abandon its tactics of preserving
neutrality between Musaddiq and London.25

Eden was
of the opinion that the United States’s co-operation during
the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company’s crisis led to the United Kingdom
having to offer the United States a share in the new oil consortium.
He did not want another American involvement in the Suez crisis
which may lead to further United States’ influence in the Middle
East, as was the case in the aftermath of the Anglo-Iranian Oil
Company. As has been mentioned, Eden, during the Suez crisis, was of
the opinion that the United Kingdom’s interests in the Middle East
were greater than

  • 23. PRO, London, CAB 128/29
    CM 34 (55) 8, 4th October 1955.

  • 24. A. EDEN, Full Circle, (London:
    Cassell, 1960). P. 198.

  • 25. Ibid, p. 202.

  • This is a unique website which will require a more modern browser to work!

    Please upgrade today!